Home

Astrology

Spiritual Realism

Mindfire
Interviews

Member Articles

Sacred Texts

Dimensions
Magazine
Archive

Forum

Links

SpiritualRealist.com

 

LOGIN | LOGOUT | COMMUNITY HOMEPAGE | AFFINITIES | MY HOME  

 

ALL OUT OF EGYPT - PAGE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 comments

 


9.

            Steiner tries to say that the cosmic being, the Logos, incarnated on our planet on a certain date in a way he never did at any other time.

The most obvious objection to this is that there is no physical evidence for the life of Jesus.  The only contemporary reference is one by Josephus, and he is a discredited witness, as even this has been conclusively proven a much later interpolation.  Steiner makes a virtue of the lack of physical evidence, with the questionable argument that it was intentional, so that we would believe in it only for spiritual, not materialistic, reasons.

            To another obvious question--what of all the people, including initiates, who lived before this event—are they “saved”?  He answers that they will still have to come to terms with it in future lives.  The implication is that pre-Christian initiates have not merely a second-class, but a luciferic initiation, since he says all pre-Christian culture was luciferic.  That some of them are supposed to have finished with reincarnation and gone on to other spheres does not seem to be adequately dealt with.  He is here also laying the foundation for what becomes the exclusivity and arrogance of his later claim that also today, only those who recognize his version of the Mystery of Golgotha can be having a Christian, i.e. “advanced” initiation.

(He speaks of two opposite forms of evil, and the Christ path as that of balance between them.  Lucifer on the one hand inspires all mysticism, enthusiasm and the arts, but on the other entices us into a premature spirituality, which leads us into an airy world of illusion.  Ahriman influences us to become too cold, logical, materialistic and technical.  These ideas can be useful if the two influences again were not dragged down into personal, anthropomorphic form.)

            Another question is scale, or proportion.  One must presume that when he speaks of “the cosmos”, he is referring only to our solar system, although it is rare that he is that explicit.  Still, according to theosophy, it takes a vast length of time—seven planetary evolutions, each with their seven globes, each of which has seven rounds, and on each appearance of a globe, the equivalent of seven successive root-races, each with their seven sub-races.  And he is saying that the one important moment in that whole process is a single incarnation in a certain year in a little country in the Middle East?  It is actually absurd.  And whether the “Turning Point of Time” actually happened depended on a chain of actions by certain individuals, any one of whom could have messed up the whole thing by omitting to do something.

            Nature, or the cosmos, does not work like that.  A tree produces thousands of seeds so that one or two may root and grow.  A race or a culture produces thousands, or millions, of bodies so that people incarnating in them can develop a new capacity or quality, and imprint it into humanity’s genetic possibilities.   But did anything like that happen?  In fact, yes.

 Egyptian culture gets a poor showing in anthroposophy.   Perhaps it had to be downplayed so that Steiner could portray them as oppressors and build up the Jews as the people chosen to prepare the Incarnation, as happens in the Old Testament.  Or perhaps he was so obsessed by the supposed Ahrimanic role played by the Arabs in the sixth to tenth centuries A.D. that this obscured his clairvoyant vision of the extraordinary Egyptian culture behind it.  For his book Egyptian Myths and Mysteries offers scarcely anything more than could have been gleaned from the scholarly books of the day.

            For at least four thousand years, a magnificent civilization flourished along

the banks of the Nile.   A happy and well-cared-for population of some twenty-five million people lived a life in harmony with the cycles of nature.  Their writings show a people who loved life.  They were ruled by real initiates who embodied the awareness of all their people, worked for their welfare, and hence were loved and respected by them.  Modern writers project their own prejudices onto them, and fantasize that the common people must have felt oppressed by such an all-powerful ruler.  On the contrary, they felt protected by him, and were.

            Not only the pharaohs were initiates, but all the leading priests.  All of life was a celebration of thanksgiving to Amon-Ra, and a preparation to enter the spiritual world after death.  There were no skeptics;  the spirit was an evident fact embodied in the priests, as also in the sun, moon and stars, in the rhythms of the seasons and in the nature around them.

The temples were also Mystery Schools, for which neophytes would be hand-picked by clairvoyant scribes who would periodically visit all the villages for the purpose.  The candidates would be schooled for many years and gradually trained to take part in the great ritual of Isis and Osiris.  What it led up to was for each man to experience himself as an Osiris.   In the myth, he would impregnate his wife Isis from the spiritual world and she would bring forth their son Horus, or Jesus.

After death, as shown in the Book of the Dead, the initiate would be addressed as Osiris Ptolemy (or whatever his name was) and would move triumphantly though the various tests to take his place in Amenti (heaven). Through the centuries, more and more people went through the temple training, so that eventually there were not just thousands, but millions of people celebrating a daily ritual wherein they realized a Christ-consciousness.

If we need to postulate a historical “Incarnation” moment, this was it.  If the objection is made that it would have to have been in the 4th Post-Atlantean Age, not the 3rd --as Steiner designates the Egyptian time--the answer is that this was something else Steiner got wrong.  One might excuse him this however, as it is one of the “blinds” H.P.B. put into The Secret Doctrine, waiting for a time when more could be given out directly.

He says the post-Atlantean time began in the Age of Cancer, in India.  Cancer however is a Cardinal Sign, and a major new epoch has to begin in a Fixed Sign.  In this case it was in the preceding Age of Leo—a time of Sun Kings (each age lasts 2160 years).  Thus Ancient India was the 2nd, Persia the 3rd, Egypt the 4th, and it was the Greco-Roman Age—the birth of philosophy--that really was the 5th Age, of Manas or mind.  Then we are now in the 6th Age already, of Buddhi (in its beginnings), brotherhood and the apocalyptic “separation of the sheep and the goats”.

 But what of the many accounts of clairvoyants who claim to have seen scenes from Jesus’ life in the Akashic Record, such as Elisabeth von Konnersreuth or Edgar Cayce, one may ask?  A small group of determined people with the requisite powers of concentration can create a thought form of such strength that others can see it.  When other people believe in it, their own thoughts and feelings further strengthen the thought-form, until it begins to take on a life of its own.  Imagine how powerful it becomes when millions have spent  their lives envisaging these scenes! 

next page

ALL OUT OF EGYPT - PAGE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 comments




TALENT
EXCHANGE
 

Home | Astrology | Spiritual Realism | Mindfire | Member Articles | Sacred Texts | Dimensions | Forum | Links | Login | Logout